<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: TD-1 29er rigid Ti prototypes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.shedfire.com/2009/08/06/td-1-29er-rigid-ti-prototypes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.shedfire.com/2009/08/06/td-1-29er-rigid-ti-prototypes/</link>
	<description>Designing for Ragley, Nukeproof and others from a shed in Calderdale.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 08:51:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dugs</title>
		<link>http://www.shedfire.com/2009/08/06/td-1-29er-rigid-ti-prototypes/comment-page-1/#comment-1008</link>
		<dc:creator>Dugs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 12:09:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shedfire.com/2009/08/06/td-1-29er-rigid-ti-prototypes/#comment-1008</guid>
		<description>Any update on these Brant?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any update on these Brant?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jboy</title>
		<link>http://www.shedfire.com/2009/08/06/td-1-29er-rigid-ti-prototypes/comment-page-1/#comment-815</link>
		<dc:creator>Jboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 16:23:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shedfire.com/2009/08/06/td-1-29er-rigid-ti-prototypes/#comment-815</guid>
		<description>Can you tell us what size seat post these frames will take? Thanks, Im looking forward to the final product!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can you tell us what size seat post these frames will take? Thanks, Im looking forward to the final product!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fast Farrell</title>
		<link>http://www.shedfire.com/2009/08/06/td-1-29er-rigid-ti-prototypes/comment-page-1/#comment-809</link>
		<dc:creator>Fast Farrell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2009 15:00:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shedfire.com/2009/08/06/td-1-29er-rigid-ti-prototypes/#comment-809</guid>
		<description>I have had a little go on one of these and tbh i was amazed on how good it felt, it&#039;s also easy to clean that Ti stuff LOL

I fancy a Ti BMX now, fancy designing one?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have had a little go on one of these and tbh i was amazed on how good it felt, it&#8217;s also easy to clean that Ti stuff LOL</p>
<p>I fancy a Ti BMX now, fancy designing one?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shedfire</title>
		<link>http://www.shedfire.com/2009/08/06/td-1-29er-rigid-ti-prototypes/comment-page-1/#comment-807</link>
		<dc:creator>shedfire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 22:43:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shedfire.com/2009/08/06/td-1-29er-rigid-ti-prototypes/#comment-807</guid>
		<description>aye - once we sign the geometry off, we&#039;ll have frames in several materials.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>aye &#8211; once we sign the geometry off, we&#8217;ll have frames in several materials.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IvanMTB</title>
		<link>http://www.shedfire.com/2009/08/06/td-1-29er-rigid-ti-prototypes/comment-page-1/#comment-806</link>
		<dc:creator>IvanMTB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 22:41:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shedfire.com/2009/08/06/td-1-29er-rigid-ti-prototypes/#comment-806</guid>
		<description>Cool stuff...
But what about steel 29-er?
Cheers!
I.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cool stuff&#8230;<br />
But what about steel 29-er?<br />
Cheers!<br />
I.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ragley Bikes &#183; A tale of two races.</title>
		<link>http://www.shedfire.com/2009/08/06/td-1-29er-rigid-ti-prototypes/comment-page-1/#comment-802</link>
		<dc:creator>Ragley Bikes &#183; A tale of two races.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 19:36:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shedfire.com/2009/08/06/td-1-29er-rigid-ti-prototypes/#comment-802</guid>
		<description>[...] Read more about the TD-1 project over on the Shedfire Design site. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Read more about the TD-1 project over on the Shedfire Design site. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony</title>
		<link>http://www.shedfire.com/2009/08/06/td-1-29er-rigid-ti-prototypes/comment-page-1/#comment-759</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 19:27:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shedfire.com/2009/08/06/td-1-29er-rigid-ti-prototypes/#comment-759</guid>
		<description>Strangely enough the dropouts look very similar to my Lynskey Ridgeline SS. They do work very well indeed although I had wondered why they were sooo long.

Brant, did you have a hand in designing the Ridgeline?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Strangely enough the dropouts look very similar to my Lynskey Ridgeline SS. They do work very well indeed although I had wondered why they were sooo long.</p>
<p>Brant, did you have a hand in designing the Ridgeline?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Swindells</title>
		<link>http://www.shedfire.com/2009/08/06/td-1-29er-rigid-ti-prototypes/comment-page-1/#comment-756</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Swindells</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 16:25:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shedfire.com/2009/08/06/td-1-29er-rigid-ti-prototypes/#comment-756</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d go for the option of short and long stop bolts and keep the total adjustment length. But that&#039;s just my HO!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d go for the option of short and long stop bolts and keep the total adjustment length. But that&#8217;s just my HO!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stoner</title>
		<link>http://www.shedfire.com/2009/08/06/td-1-29er-rigid-ti-prototypes/comment-page-1/#comment-755</link>
		<dc:creator>Stoner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 15:19:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shedfire.com/2009/08/06/td-1-29er-rigid-ti-prototypes/#comment-755</guid>
		<description>&quot;470mm rigid AND 120mm suspension fork.&quot;

that&#039;s your problem, not mine, you&#039;re the designer :)

Where does mark put the split in the dropout to install the belt?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;470mm rigid AND 120mm suspension fork.&#8221;</p>
<p>that&#8217;s your problem, not mine, you&#8217;re the designer <img src='http://www.shedfire.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Where does mark put the split in the dropout to install the belt?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shedfire</title>
		<link>http://www.shedfire.com/2009/08/06/td-1-29er-rigid-ti-prototypes/comment-page-1/#comment-754</link>
		<dc:creator>shedfire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 15:07:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shedfire.com/2009/08/06/td-1-29er-rigid-ti-prototypes/#comment-754</guid>
		<description>Mark Lynskey has just mailed me:-

The dropouts on your frame have enough travel to properly tension a belt
drive system.  Our standard version has a slot that is about 13mm shorter.
Since this was a prototype I chose to put the longer ones as it gives you
more to play around with.


The stop bolt length is also shorter on the standard version slider.

Saw the question on the bolts being so close together.  If you make them
farther apart you will lose the travel necessary to tension the belt.


There is an optional aluminum slider pc for Rolhoff use as well</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark Lynskey has just mailed me:-</p>
<p>The dropouts on your frame have enough travel to properly tension a belt<br />
drive system.  Our standard version has a slot that is about 13mm shorter.<br />
Since this was a prototype I chose to put the longer ones as it gives you<br />
more to play around with.</p>
<p>The stop bolt length is also shorter on the standard version slider.</p>
<p>Saw the question on the bolts being so close together.  If you make them<br />
farther apart you will lose the travel necessary to tension the belt.</p>
<p>There is an optional aluminum slider pc for Rolhoff use as well</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
