<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Looking back to go forward</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.shedfire.com/2009/05/27/looking-back-to-go-forward/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.shedfire.com/2009/05/27/looking-back-to-go-forward/</link>
	<description>Designing for On-One, Titus and Planet X from Calderdale.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 22:08:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: eggman</title>
		<link>http://www.shedfire.com/2009/05/27/looking-back-to-go-forward/comment-page-1/#comment-533</link>
		<dc:creator>eggman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 13:36:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shedfire.com/2009/05/27/looking-back-to-go-forward/#comment-533</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d buy a frame built around a 1 x 9 setup.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d buy a frame built around a 1 x 9 setup.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thruton_Thrasher</title>
		<link>http://www.shedfire.com/2009/05/27/looking-back-to-go-forward/comment-page-1/#comment-532</link>
		<dc:creator>Thruton_Thrasher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 11:00:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shedfire.com/2009/05/27/looking-back-to-go-forward/#comment-532</guid>
		<description>Its interesting how gearing almost adapts by itself to the terrain you are riding. Most commuting bikes loose gears over the course of their life by neglect or design. Riding the same tracks all the time and you use the same gears, making you think about reducing the number you need. For example I think most trail centres could be ridden using a 2x9 setup with no granny ring.

Brant, are you moving towards Calderdale specific frames and gearing?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its interesting how gearing almost adapts by itself to the terrain you are riding. Most commuting bikes loose gears over the course of their life by neglect or design. Riding the same tracks all the time and you use the same gears, making you think about reducing the number you need. For example I think most trail centres could be ridden using a 2&#215;9 setup with no granny ring.</p>
<p>Brant, are you moving towards Calderdale specific frames and gearing?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrian</title>
		<link>http://www.shedfire.com/2009/05/27/looking-back-to-go-forward/comment-page-1/#comment-531</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 04:13:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shedfire.com/2009/05/27/looking-back-to-go-forward/#comment-531</guid>
		<description>thats an interesting build,,,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thats an interesting build,,,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

