Comments on: Shame. http://www.shedfire.com/2009/05/13/shame/ Designing for On-One, Titus and Planet X from Calderdale. Sat, 04 Feb 2012 22:08:22 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Willie http://www.shedfire.com/2009/05/13/shame/comment-page-1/#comment-517 Willie Thu, 21 May 2009 14:47:59 +0000 http://www.shedfire.com/2009/05/13/shame/#comment-517 Let somebody else name there product after "Meth-head" users, tweakers as they are called on the left side of the pond. Anything is better than tweak! Let somebody else name there product after “Meth-head” users, tweakers as they are called on the left side of the pond. Anything is better than tweak!

]]> By: Twenty Nine Inches » Blog Archive » News And Rumors http://www.shedfire.com/2009/05/13/shame/comment-page-1/#comment-515 Twenty Nine Inches » Blog Archive » News And Rumors Wed, 20 May 2009 12:39:59 +0000 http://www.shedfire.com/2009/05/13/shame/#comment-515 [...] “Tweaks” The Name: Due to a technicality, Brant Richards of Shedfire Design has decided to go from using the name ‘tweak” for [...] [...] “Tweaks” The Name: Due to a technicality, Brant Richards of Shedfire Design has decided to go from using the name ‘tweak” for [...]

]]> By: dave http://www.shedfire.com/2009/05/13/shame/comment-page-1/#comment-493 dave Thu, 14 May 2009 08:27:17 +0000 http://www.shedfire.com/2009/05/13/shame/#comment-493 it is a shame :( still, at least you hadbn't already had the promotional beanie hats and boxer shorts stitched yet eh? ...you are having promotional beanie hats and boxer shorts aren't you...?! it is a shame :(

still, at least you hadbn’t already had the promotional beanie hats and boxer shorts stitched yet eh?

…you are having promotional beanie hats and boxer shorts aren’t you…?!

]]> By: Ratadog http://www.shedfire.com/2009/05/13/shame/comment-page-1/#comment-492 Ratadog Wed, 13 May 2009 21:54:42 +0000 http://www.shedfire.com/2009/05/13/shame/#comment-492 Make that a no then. Make that a no then.

]]> By: Ratadog http://www.shedfire.com/2009/05/13/shame/comment-page-1/#comment-491 Ratadog Wed, 13 May 2009 21:53:57 +0000 http://www.shedfire.com/2009/05/13/shame/#comment-491 Slightly worried that my last post seems to have randomly capitalised all references to the owner of this website. Wonder whether it will also randomly capitalise the royal we or only works with personal pronouns related to Brant as in you or he. Forgive the experimental nature of this post. Slightly worried that my last post seems to have randomly capitalised all references to the owner of this website. Wonder whether it will also randomly capitalise the royal we or only works with personal pronouns related to Brant as in you or he.

Forgive the experimental nature of this post.

]]> By: Ratadog http://www.shedfire.com/2009/05/13/shame/comment-page-1/#comment-490 Ratadog Wed, 13 May 2009 21:49:33 +0000 http://www.shedfire.com/2009/05/13/shame/#comment-490 Good grief. That's a blast from the past from when I was young enough and rich enough to toy with the idea of going rallying. Mortgage and family put a stop to that and now I just spend the occasional day doing safety cover and helping to pull other people out of their mangled motors. I have to say that the possibility of confusing You and them never crossed my mind. Can't see them going into the titanium hardtail business and agree with others that You have finished up with a better name as a result. Good grief. That’s a blast from the past from when I was young enough and rich enough to toy with the idea of going rallying. Mortgage and family put a stop to that and now I just spend the occasional day doing safety cover and helping to pull other people out of their mangled motors. I have to say that the possibility of confusing You and them never crossed my mind. Can’t see them going into the titanium hardtail business and agree with others that You have finished up with a better name as a result.

]]> By: Spence http://www.shedfire.com/2009/05/13/shame/comment-page-1/#comment-489 Spence Wed, 13 May 2009 20:51:38 +0000 http://www.shedfire.com/2009/05/13/shame/#comment-489 How about Tweakley...?! How about Tweakley…?!

]]> By: Harry the Spider http://www.shedfire.com/2009/05/13/shame/comment-page-1/#comment-488 Harry the Spider Wed, 13 May 2009 20:11:11 +0000 http://www.shedfire.com/2009/05/13/shame/#comment-488 How about Twonk? How about Twonk?

]]> By: Graeme http://www.shedfire.com/2009/05/13/shame/comment-page-1/#comment-487 Graeme Wed, 13 May 2009 18:11:57 +0000 http://www.shedfire.com/2009/05/13/shame/#comment-487 mate, Ragley is better (I think anyway!) mate, Ragley is better (I think anyway!)

]]> By: Ash http://www.shedfire.com/2009/05/13/shame/comment-page-1/#comment-486 Ash Wed, 13 May 2009 17:14:39 +0000 http://www.shedfire.com/2009/05/13/shame/#comment-486 Ragley is much better :) Ragley is much better :)

]]>