<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ragley Ti-re clearance + caliper position</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.shedfire.com/2009/03/29/ragley-ti-re-clearance-caliper-position/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.shedfire.com/2009/03/29/ragley-ti-re-clearance-caliper-position/</link>
	<description>Designing for Ragley, Nukeproof and others from a shed in Calderdale.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 18:45:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: shedfire</title>
		<link>http://www.shedfire.com/2009/03/29/ragley-ti-re-clearance-caliper-position/comment-page-1/#comment-373</link>
		<dc:creator>shedfire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 06:33:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shedfire.com/?p=210#comment-373</guid>
		<description>Not tried yet. Will have a look today. Might be with a 185mm rotor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not tried yet. Will have a look today. Might be with a 185mm rotor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kev</title>
		<link>http://www.shedfire.com/2009/03/29/ragley-ti-re-clearance-caliper-position/comment-page-1/#comment-372</link>
		<dc:creator>kev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 23:40:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shedfire.com/?p=210#comment-372</guid>
		<description>Great looking frame!  Is there enough room to use a bb7 as the rear brake?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great looking frame!  Is there enough room to use a bb7 as the rear brake?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shedfire</title>
		<link>http://www.shedfire.com/2009/03/29/ragley-ti-re-clearance-caliper-position/comment-page-1/#comment-137</link>
		<dc:creator>shedfire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 12:42:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shedfire.com/?p=210#comment-137</guid>
		<description>I guess I should have written &quot;heavily ovalised&quot; tubing is frowned up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess I should have written &#8220;heavily ovalised&#8221; tubing is frowned up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ChrisS</title>
		<link>http://www.shedfire.com/2009/03/29/ragley-ti-re-clearance-caliper-position/comment-page-1/#comment-136</link>
		<dc:creator>ChrisS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 12:38:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shedfire.com/?p=210#comment-136</guid>
		<description>I thought the on-one ti29 had ovalised tubing? or at least &quot;not round&quot; tubing...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought the on-one ti29 had ovalised tubing? or at least &#8220;not round&#8221; tubing&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chipps</title>
		<link>http://www.shedfire.com/2009/03/29/ragley-ti-re-clearance-caliper-position/comment-page-1/#comment-124</link>
		<dc:creator>Chipps</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 18:58:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shedfire.com/?p=210#comment-124</guid>
		<description>Is this the same Lynskeys who used to advocate oval and even octagonal tubing when they were running Litespeed? They said that cold-working tubes was great.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is this the same Lynskeys who used to advocate oval and even octagonal tubing when they were running Litespeed? They said that cold-working tubes was great.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
